Search

Make Journalism Honest Again

PROPOSED
$ raised

A Proposed Bounty needs to reach the Minimum amount of money to become a Wanted Bounty. If you want this solved, help make it happen!

$ minimum required
11% goal met
2 contributors
2018-11-16 00:00:00

Initiated By

Mike Cernovich
$100 Recurring Reward - End "Pay to Play" in Journalism
About
Contributors

We demand honest journalism, and we aren't getting it. One way " journalists" lie to the public is by giving free advertising to their friends and cronies. "Journalists" also often write puff pieces about one another, promoting each other's books and personal brands, without disclosing their personal ties to one another.

Each quid pro quo you discover will entitle you to a $100 reward.

Journalists commit fraud on the public when they trade media cover amongst themselves. These pay to play relationships are unethical and must be disclosed to the public.

Find examples of undisclosed quid pro quos between journalists. While there will rarely be a smoking gun, look for the timing of articles. Here's an example:

Nick Bilton wrote a puff piece on Sam Biddle entitled, "Disruptions: A Blogger Mocks the Denizens of Silicon Valley." This article appeared in the Times on August 25, 2013.

The article is here: http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/08/25/disruptions-a-blogger-mocks-the-denizens-of-silicon-valley/

Sam Biddle then wrote a glowing review of Nick Bilton's book on Gawker. The article was entitled, "Jack Dorsey Screwed His Friends at Twitter," and it appeared on October 9, 2013.

That article is here: http://valleywag.gawker.com/jack-dorsey-screwed-his-friends-at-twitter-1442895501

The timing of these articles suggests an undisclosed quid pro quo between Bilton. In neither article did the authors disclose their reciprocal "journalistic" relationship.

For each example of quid pro quo, I, Mike Cernovich, will give out a $100 reward through this bounty until we hit the $10,000 minimum. Submit your examples on this page or e-mail them to [email protected]

Anonymous
Contributed $

THE POSTING, PUBLICATION OR OTHER DISSEMINATION OF ANY PARTICULAR BOUNTY IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS A STATEMENT OF FACT, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED. IT IS TO BE UNDERSTOOD SOLELY AS A NEWSGATHERING QUESTION THAT MAY OR MAY NOT BE ANSWERABLE AND WESEARCHR MAKES NO FACTUAL ASSERTION WITH REGARD TO THE CONTENT OF THE BOUNTY.